GilmoreGirls.org Forum
May 18, 2022, 05:06:12 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Star  We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We have the capability to build the world's best Gilmore Girls forum. The ORG Forum will be just that. Better than it was before. Better, stronger, faster.  Star 
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: Do you prefer Amy or David?  (Voting closed: January 22, 2007, 08:57:36 pm)
Amy Sherman-Palladino - 12 (70.6%)
David S. Rosenthal - 0 (0%)
I don't see a big difference. - 4 (23.5%)
I don't even care. - 0 (0%)
They got new writers?!?!? - 1 (5.9%)
Total Voters: 17

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
Author Topic: Amy Appreciation Thread - Because we've gone 6 seasons with her!  (Read 31825 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
magnus greel
Stars Hollow Tourist
*

Community Points: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: July 09, 2007, 06:44:01 pm »

the writers for west wing would ahve done well with gilmore girls. Imho.

True.  I associate the two programs because ofd the wit and rapid, dry, ironic exchanges.

I heard both ASP and DP wanted a two year agreement so that they could devote less of their time to dealing with the network and getting picked up again, and more time to the complicated task of doing 26 (?) hours of quality TV crammed with jokes and different characters.   It sounded as if the reason might have been exhaustion, basically.   DP talked about their having to oversee everything large or small in GG.   He said, half-jokingly maybe, that they couldn't deal with the network over renewal, and still have time to make sure all the knick-knacks at Lorelais' desk at the Inn were in the right places.
Logged
gilmorefriend
Official Gilmore Girl
*****

Community Points: 1354
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 14326



View Profile
« Reply #61 on: July 09, 2007, 07:21:23 pm »

I do not care at all if they were busy! DP and ASP could have figured something out!!!
Logged

THIS ACCOUNT IS SO OLD BUT I DON'T HAVE THE HEART TO DELETE IT PRETEND I DON'T EXIST
gilmorefriend
Official Gilmore Girl
*****

Community Points: 1354
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 14326



View Profile
« Reply #62 on: July 17, 2007, 12:26:26 am »

This thread has been dead for a long time!
Logged

THIS ACCOUNT IS SO OLD BUT I DON'T HAVE THE HEART TO DELETE IT PRETEND I DON'T EXIST
PrettyTownSpinster
Diner Regular
**

Community Points: 354
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1288



View Profile WWW
« Reply #63 on: July 17, 2007, 08:02:38 am »

There is already and Amy thread

http://www.gilmoregirls.org/forum/index.php?topic=4587.0

Please do a search before you open new threads and please read the forum rules concerning opening new threads.  We are trying to keep the boards nice and clean

Note:  This thread has been merged
« Last Edit: July 25, 2007, 07:49:32 am by PrettyTownSpinster » Logged

                          My New Website
gilmorefriend
Official Gilmore Girl
*****

Community Points: 1354
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 14326



View Profile
« Reply #64 on: July 17, 2007, 11:13:58 am »

Sorry! I do not know how to delete it then.
Logged

THIS ACCOUNT IS SO OLD BUT I DON'T HAVE THE HEART TO DELETE IT PRETEND I DON'T EXIST
shinkeiko
Town Troubadour
*

Community Points: -17
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: July 24, 2007, 02:07:32 pm »

i miss amy!!! Cry
Logged

*im awesome*
gilmorefriend
Official Gilmore Girl
*****

Community Points: 1354
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 14326



View Profile
« Reply #66 on: July 24, 2007, 10:19:54 pm »

I really do not miss her. I thought David was a pretty good writer for the show! I really do not care who writes as long as it is GG!
Logged

THIS ACCOUNT IS SO OLD BUT I DON'T HAVE THE HEART TO DELETE IT PRETEND I DON'T EXIST
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.025 seconds with 22 queries.