GILMORE GIRLS’ LAUREN GRAHAM
“RELIEVED” SHOW IS OVER; WISHES SHOW CREATOR AMY SHERMAN-PALLADINO HAD COME BACK TO WRITE FINALEMay 7th, 2007
In a new interview with TVGuide.com’s Michael Ausiello, Gilmore Girls star Lauren Graham expresses relief that that the show has been canceled and that talks of bringing it back for a final 13 episodes were finally hushed.
“I feel relieved—which is not without feeling mixed and thankful for the experience. I've been at this for a long time; I feel ready to move on,” Graham says. “There was a lot that went back and forth by the time the [13 episode thing] came out. I had sort of said to them a couple of months ago that I didn't see it coming back, and they had asked to just give them some time to figure something out that would make it work.”
In an effort to keep the show going for a final season, producers entertained various options, including having Graham produce a version of the show that focused mostly on TV daughter Rory (Alexis Bledel). But ultimately it came down to a matter of cutting back on Graham and Bleldel’s stringent work schedules, while still maintaining the show’s integrity—something Graham saw as impossible. “[Warner Bros. and the CW] were trying to think of everything…trying to find a way to make it work. [But] we just didn't want to work the schedule we'd been working…[and] if we're working a lesser schedule, what is the show?” she says.
Graham also talks about the creative process on the show since creator Amy Sherman Palladino—whose adept writing gave Lorelai her signature quick witty banter—left the show last year, amid a contract scuffle with network brass. “This year was strange sometimes because I had a lot less to say, and that was really weird,” she says. “For some people I'm sure that was great, but I would find myself in long scenes where I was not rattling on, and it was just really weird to me. And so I did sort of question, ‘Are we keeping this character consistent?’ And [producers] were responsive to me.”
Still, Graham would have liked Palladino to be back—if only for the swan song. “What I hoped — and this is not to take away from David Rosenthal [Palladino's successor, executive producer], who I had a really nice year with — was that she would write the finale,” she says. “But that's not the way she works. She's either there 100 percent [or not at all]. She couldn't just come in and pick up another story that she didn't lay the groundwork for and finish it. I wish she had been more involved this year, because I was playing a piece of her that is so specifically her. I missed her writing.”
As for her future on TV, Graham says she is wide open—that is, after she’s had a bit of a break and time to mourn the passing of Girls. “I would do another TV series, but not right away. I love TV. But I'm going to really just enjoy this time and make sure I'm ready to do something new,” she says. “If I had the best thing in front of me right now I don't know that I'd be able to be excited about it, 'cause I think [you have to make room] to let the other thing pass. So, yeah, I'd love to take a year and see what else I can do.”
Credit:
http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello-Report/Lauren-Grahams-Final/800014383